Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
Findings
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Energy Findings
    • Resilience Findings
    • Safety Findings
    • Transport Findings
    • Urban Findings
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Blog
  • covid-19
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:5959/feed
Transport Findings
February 22, 2025 AEST

Clinicians’ Perspectives on Transportation Barriers to Low Vision Care in the Rural Midwest

Ciara Nelson-Forcade, Aysan Esmaely, John D. Shepherd, M.D., Abigail L. Cochran, Ph.D.,
BlindnessDisabilityLow VisionRural TransportationRural HealthcareTransportation BarriersClinician PerspectivesOlder Adults
Copyright Logoccby-sa-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.129899
Findings
Nelson-Forcade, Ciara, Aysan Esmaely, John D. Shepherd, and Abigail L. Cochran. 2025. “Clinicians’ Perspectives on Transportation Barriers to Low Vision Care in the Rural Midwest.” Findings, February. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.32866/​001c.129899.
Save article as...▾
Download all (2)
  • Figure 1. Codes used to analyze transcripts using flexible coding. Figure adapted from (Oluyede et al. 2022).
    Download
  • Appendix
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

Transportation barriers hinder millions of Americans from accessing low vision care, with challenges being particularly pronounced in rural areas. This study examines clinicians’ perspectives on these barriers, focusing on Nebraska and Kansas—two predominantly rural Midwestern states. Through semi-structured interviews with optometrists, ophthalmologists, and occupational therapists, this research highlights key issues, including transportation barriers to appointments, reliance on support networks, rural-specific challenges, and the limitations and strengths of existing transportation programs intended to facilitate access to care. These clinicians provide valuable insights, emphasizing the inaccessibility and unaffordability of transportation across different modes in these rural states.

1. Questions

Nearly 50 million Americans have low vision, and many encounter daily transportation barriers that hinder access to essential services, including healthcare (American Foundation for the Blind 2024; Khimani et al. 2021; Lam and Leat 2013). Scarce transportation in rural areas further limits residents’ access to care (Goldstein et al. 2012; Starbird et al. 2019).

This study investigates clinicians’ perspectives on transportation barriers to low vision care. It makes a significant contribution to the limited body of work highlighting clinicians’ viewpoints, representing an underexplored area of transportation research (Fields et al. 2020; Oluyede, Cochran, Prunkl, et al. 2022; Oluyede, Cochran, Wolfe, et al. 2022). Our work focused on clinicians in Nebraska and Kansas—both predominately rural Midwestern states. The clinicians’ extensive experience with low-vision patients from diverse backgrounds provides valuable insights into the unique challenges faced by suburban and, especially, rural populations, which remain underrepresented in prior research.

The research addressed two key questions:

  1. What transportation barriers do clinicians observe among their patients seeking healthcare?

  2. How do these barriers affect patients’ health and well-being?

2. Methods

Following previous research on transportation barriers to healthcare, we conducted 8, 20–30-minute, semi-structured interviews over Zoom with clinicians in Nebraska and Kansas. Qualitative techniques using open-ended interviews offer opportunities to understand “complex, multifaceted challenges,” and clinicians provide insights into financial, geographical, social, and infrastructural barriers (Ballantyne et al. 2019; Fields et al. 2020; Oluyede, Cochran, Prunkl, et al. 2022). This work employed purposive and snowball sampling of clinicians recruited through emails and phone calls using publicly available information and recommendations from other clinicians. Our sample included occupational therapists (3), optometrists (2), and ophthalmologists (3) who have worked with low-vision patients ranging from 5 to 40 years at their current locations. Due to the limited number of low vision specialists in the Midwest, our sample size reflects a substantial number of providers serving the area. We conducted interviews between October and December 2024. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln approved the study.

Two authors recorded, transcribed, and coded all interviews using a flexible coding approach in Dedoose, a qualitative data analysis (QDA) software. The codes (Figure 1) were applied across three hierarchical categories: attributes describing interviewee characteristics, index codes linked to interview questions, and analytic codes capturing specific themes within participants’ narratives (Deterding and Waters 2018).

Figure 1
Figure 1.Codes used to analyze transcripts using flexible coding. Figure adapted from (Oluyede, Cochran, Wolfe, et al. 2022).

3. Findings

Despite the distances that rural low-vision patients travel, appointments are frequently canceled and rescheduled for therapy and check-ups. Interviewees attributed this issue to dependence on others for transportation—typically family members, private facilities (e.g., assisted living facilities), and local transit agencies. These options can leave patients waiting at clinics for hours for a ride to pick them up (Table 1). Public transit users in urban areas may experience relatively shorter wait times compared to those relying on paratransit, private facility transportation, or family members for travel. Occupational therapists and previous research noted that the care provided to individuals facing transportation barriers is negatively impacted when appointments are delayed or missed (Oluyede, Cochran, Prunkl, et al. 2022).

Table 1.Clinician interview excerpts discussing key issues regarding healthcare and transportation for individuals with low vision.
Cancellations, Reschedules, and Wait Times
"I would think a lot of our cancellations are probably transportation-related."
"We often hear that transportation is the issue, and sometimes that’s why they’re not coming to our clinic, is because they just can’t get transportation."
"One thing I always noticed and felt bad about is they [private facility transit] bring several people to appointments, so the patients would be almost at our office for over four hours, and sometimes in the afternoon, they're still waiting for their ride to pick them up."
" I remember one lady told me 'I'll probably be here really early for my appointment, because I kind of just, you know, go when they can get me.'"
"It's the car is broken down. They don't have money for gas. Their daughter had another appointment."
"They're reliant on a family member to drive them, and that family member may have other conflicts, so they end up just not going."
Support Networks and Burden
"They're completely reliant on friends and family to drive them if they're unable to drive themselves."
"The ones who still have a living spouse that can drive have an easier time with transportation, but those that rely on family members or friends really struggle."
"Most of my patients either have a friend that they rely on or a family member, just because it’s not only getting here but, you know it’s doing other things too."
“You’ll have patients that say, well, my friend could drive me today, but I don’t know if they can drive me next time."
"Many of my older patients don’t even have a smartphone. You know, they have maybe a flip phone… I would say my older patients, some are comfortable with it [technology] if they have a grandkid."
Rural Challenges
"I have someone who came yesterday for four hours to see me. They came by private car, but they had to make arrangements to stay overnight because of the distance."
"In western Nebraska, it’s going to take somebody hours and hours to get to that client or get to that patient."
“[If] they don’t ask their family members to take them, they don’t come to an appointment."
"[There is a] lack of knowledge in the rural communities of what low vision and blindness is. For example, we might have a child that is the first person ever in a school to have low vision or multiple disabilities."
"They don’t have a system [to use public transportation] in place, because there hasn’t been a need for that."
"They’re not used to public transportation, so relying on public transportation is a very new thing outside of their comfort zone."
Program Observations
"[Paratransit’s] not reliable. It’s not a dependable type of thing. They have an appointment, and then they have to be there at a certain time."
"People don’t have the resources… it would be more challenging if they don’t have the money to pay for things, pay for the rides… people that don’t have close family or friends to help them.”

Clinicians mentioned individuals with low vision rely heavily on their support networks, such as family or friends, for transportation. These friends and family members assist with medical and non-medical activities, leading to greater dependence among individuals with low vision. This dependence often carries feelings of being a burden, which clinicians observed (Table 1). This reliance is usually inconsistent or unreliable, as patients must navigate others’ schedules without a guaranteed ride. Individuals with low vision often face driving cessation later in life, making transitioning to alternative transportation a significant challenge (Cochran 2020). Beyond transportation, many older adults, with and without disabilities, struggle with technology—including telehealth platforms and ride-hailing applications—further complicating access to healthcare. Occupational therapists noted that patients wanted to improve their technology skills to increase their confidence and independence.

Clinicians providing low vision care are sparse and overburdened, especially in rural areas. As a result, some patients must travel 3–6 hours for a single visit, relying on private cars because rural public transportation is limited or unavailable (Table 1). Patients unwilling to ask family or friends for such long rides may forego care entirely, as noted by an optometrist who saw patients stop coming to appointments when they no longer felt comfortable asking their family members for a ride. These trips can impose significant financial burdens on families, as perceived by the interviewees. Furthermore, smaller populations in rural areas are often unaware of resources available for individuals with low vision. For example, when someone in a family loses their vision, there is limited awareness within the community about how to seek help or access support, which was noted by an ophthalmologist working with blind and low-vision children.

Clinicians expressed concerns about the transportation challenges reported by their patients, citing reliability and affordability as significant issues. Unreliable public transit and costly ride-shares were frequently mentioned (Table 1). To address these concerns, Omaha, Nebraska, has implemented a “Share A Fare” program which provides a 50% refund for ride-share services for individuals with low vision. In Kansas City, occupational therapists visit patients in their homes within a 60-mile radius of the clinic. One clinician shared that her sister, who has a disability, lives in San Francisco and has access to inexpensive transit from the city. Rural towns and clinics can model programs like home visits and transport subsidies to better serve populations with low vision and other disabilities. This presents an aspirational model for Nebraska, Kansas, and beyond that prioritizes accessible and equitable transportation for individuals with disabilities, enabling reliable access to healthcare without reliance on private vehicles.


Acknowledgments

The U.S. Department of Transportation supported this research financially through the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) Mid-America Transportation Center for Transportation Safety and Equity under contract number 69A3552348307. UNL’s Research Council: Faculty Seed Grants program also supported this research.

Submitted: December 21, 2024 AEST

Accepted: February 19, 2025 AEST

References

American Foundation for the Blind. 2024. “Adults.” The American Foundation for the Blind. February 2024. https:/​/​afb.org/​research-and-initiatives/​statistics/​adults-vision-loss-nhis.
Ballantyne, M., L. Liscumb, E. Brandon, J. Jaffar, A. Macdonald, and L. Beaune. 2019. “Mothers’ Perceived Barriers to and Recommendations for Health Care Appointment Keeping for Children Who Have Cerebral Palsy.” Global Qualitative Nursing Research 6:2333393619868979. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1177/​2333393619868979.
Google Scholar
Cochran, A. L. 2020. “Impacts of COVID-19 on Access to Transportation for People with Disabilities.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 8:100263. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.trip.2020.100263.
Google Scholar
Deterding, N. M., and M. C. Waters. 2018. “Flexible Coding of In-Depth Interviews: A Twenty-First-Century Approach.” Sociological Methods & Research, 004912411879937. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1177/​0049124118799377.
Google Scholar
Fields, N. L., V. J. Miller, C. Cronley, K. (Kate) Hyun, S. P. Mattingly, S. Khademi, S. R. R. Nargesi, and J. Williams. 2020. “Interprofessional Collaboration to Promote Transportation Equity for Environmental Justice Populations: A Mixed Methods Study of Civil Engineers, Transportation Planners, and Social Workers’ Perspectives.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 5:100110. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.trip.2020.100110.
Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. E., R. W. Massof, J. T. Deremeik, S. Braudway, M. L. Jackson, K. B. Kehler, S. A. Primo, J. S. Sunness, and Low-vision Research Network Study Group. 2012. “Baseline Traits of Low-Vision Patients Served by Private Outpatient Clinical Centers in the United States.” Archives of Ophthalmology 130 (8): 1028–37. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1001/​archophthalmol.2012.1197.
Google Scholar
Khimani, K. S., C. R. Battle, L. Malaya, A. Zaidi, M. Schmitz-Brown, H.-M. Tzeng, and P. K. Gupta. 2021. “Barriers to Low-Vision Rehabilitation Services for Visually Impaired Patients in a Multidisciplinary Ophthalmology Outpatient Practice.” Journal of Ophthalmology 2021 (1): 6122246. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1155/​2021/​6122246.
Google Scholar
Lam, N., and S. J. Leat. 2013. “Barriers to Accessing Low-Vision Care: The Patient’s Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 48 (6): 458–62. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jcjo.2013.02.014.
Google Scholar
Oluyede, L., A. L. Cochran, L. Prunkl, J. Wang, M. Wolfe, and N. C. McDonald. 2022. “Unpacking Transportation Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Health Care: Interviews with Care Coordinators.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 13:100565. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.trip.2022.100565.
Google Scholar
Oluyede, L., A. L. Cochran, M. Wolfe, L. Prunkl, and N. McDonald. 2022. “Addressing Transportation Barriers to Health Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Care Coordinators.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 159:157–68. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.tra.2022.03.010.
Google Scholar
Starbird, L. E., C. DiMaina, C.-A. Sun, and H.-R. Han. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Interventions to Minimize Transportation Barriers Among People with Chronic Diseases.” Journal of Community Health 44 (2): 400–411. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s10900-018-0572-3.
Google Scholar

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system