Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
Findings
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Energy Findings
    • Resilience Findings
    • Safety Findings
    • Transport Findings
    • Urban Findings
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Blog
  • covid-19
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:3455/feed
Transport Findings
December 31, 2024 AEST

The Behavioral Impact of Free Public Transport in Stavanger, Norway

Fredrik Alexander Gregersen, Petter Christiansen, Nils Fearnley, Knut Liland Hartveit, Andreas Kokkvoll Tveit,
public transportfreefaresbusfree public transit
Copyright Logoccby-sa-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.127735
Findings
Gregersen, Fredrik Alexander, Petter Christiansen, Nils Fearnley, Knut Liland Hartveit, and Andreas Kokkvoll Tveit. 2024. “The Behavioral Impact of Free Public Transport in Stavanger, Norway.” Findings, December. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.32866/​001c.127735.
Save article as...▾
Download all (2)
  • Figure 1. Kolumbus’ fare zones of Rogaland county (marked in red in small frame).
    Download
  • Figure 2. Percentage change in the number of boardings on public transport in Stavanger, the rest of Rogaland county and all local bus transport in Norway (quarterly figures) compared to April 2022.
    Download

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

If this problem reoccurs, please contact Scholastica Support

Error message:

undefined

View more stats

Abstract

Free public transport was introduced for residents of Stavanger municipality, Norway, in June 2023 through December 2023. This paper analyzes travel behavioral effects. We apply the change in total number of boardings in public transport in Stavanger municipality compared to neighboring municipalities (i.e., difference-in-differences). The data are based on automatic passenger counts (APC) on buses operated by the public transport provider in the area (Kolumbus). We find a 7.5 % increase in the number of boardings in Stavanger compared to the rest of the county (Rogaland) after the introduction of free public transit.

1. QUESTIONS

In the summer of 2023, Stavanger City Council decided that their residents would receive free public transport tickets within Nord-Jæren fare zone (Stavanger and the neighboring municipalities) starting from July 3rd, 2023. Stavanger is a municipality on the West Coast of Norway and the largest city in the county of Rogaland with a population of approximately 150,000 (see map in figure 1). The local free-fare policy applied to all local public transport services, i.e. buses, boats, and trains. [1] To travel for free on public transport, residents needed a valid ticket. Only those registered as residents in Stavanger municipality were entitled to a free ticket. Other travelers had to pay regular fares[2]. The aim of this paper is to quantify the change in public transit boardings caused by the introduction of free public transport for Stavanger residents.

Figure 1
Figure 1.Kolumbus’ fare zones of Rogaland county (marked in red in small frame).

Source: https://www.kolumbus.no/en/tickets/zones-and-zone-maps.

Free public transit has been implemented in several cities. Most studies find large increases in passenger numbers as a result of free public transit (Fearnley 2013; Kębłowski 2020). Cats, Susilo, and Reimal (2017) find that in Tallinn, there is a 14 % increase in the use of public transport as a result of the introduction of free public transport for its citizens. Using data from Templin in Germany, Storchmann (2003), finds several hundred percent increases in passenger numbers caused by free public transit. Also, in Aubagne in France they observe substantial increases in public transport after the introduction of free public transit (Volinski 2012). However, there are some exceptions. For example, in Luxembourg, where free public transport was introduced in 2020, most preliminary studies indicate that the usage of public transport (and car) has remained almost unchanged as a result (Duxfield 2022).

Two features distinguish the present paper from a majority of existing studies. First, our difference-in-differences (DiD) design implies measuring both treatment and control groups before and after the intervention. This contrasts a before-after design with no control, which several studies have used. Furthermore, our data are generated by automated traffic counters (APC), thereby reducing the problems of self-selection which may create bias in survey data.

2. METHODS

In our study, we utilized data from APC systems, which record the number of passengers boarding and alighting buses throughout Rogaland. These APC data are essential for evaluating the impact of free public transport on the entire population, as they provide detailed data on boardings per stop on an hourly basis for each bus line in Rogaland. The dataset includes information such as the date, bus line number, stop name and number, municipality, and the number of boardings per hour. The dataset comprises approximately 39 million observations (i.e., the number of boardings per stop per hour), covering the period from January 2022 to end of 2023.

Figure 2 illustrates the percentage change in the number of boardings on bus in Stavanger and the rest of the county (Rogaland) compared to April 2022 in each of the regions. The figure indicates that Stavanger and the rest of Rogaland follow similar trends until the introduction of free public transport in July 2023. From the introduction of free public transport, Stavanger has more boardings per month compared to April 2022 than the rest of Rogaland. The figure also includes data for Norway as a whole[3].

Figure 2
Figure 2.Percentage change in the number of boardings on public transport in Stavanger, the rest of Rogaland county and all local bus transport in Norway (quarterly figures) compared to April 2022.

The black vertical line identifies the date after which public transport was free for Stavanger citizens.

Given that many factors influence travel behavior change over time — such as the drop in public transport usage during the pandemic followed by a gradual recovery — we employed Rogaland (the rest of the county) as control group to isolate the effect of the free public transport initiative. This approach allows us to compare changes among residents of Stavanger with those in the control group, thus accounting for any time-specific factors that affect all units of observation. Importantly, this includes seasonal and weather fluctuations as well as societal and policy changes that might affect both groups similarly. More specifically, we apply panel data with fixed effects. When we use this DiD design (e.g., Angrist and Pischke 2010), the DiD estimate equals the interaction between the treatment group (here: Stavanger) and the post-treatment period (observations made while the free-fare policy was in force).

3. FINDINGS

Table 1 presents the results from two regression analyses, showing the percentage increase in public transport usage in Stavanger per day due to the introduction of free public transport. The first column, labeled “Whole Day,” indicates a 7.5 % increase in daily boardings in Stavanger attributable to the initiative. Since we cannot identify the residence of passengers from the APC data, we conducted an additional validation analysis focusing on morning peak hours (06:00-09:00). We assume that boardings during these hours are predominantly by residents of the municipality. This analysis revealed an 9.1 % increase in boardings in Stavanger during the morning peak (Table 1).

Table 1.Panel data regression with fixed effect for each municipality
Dependent variable: natural logarithm of number of boardings per day
Panel data regression with fixed effects for each municipality#
Coefficient Whole day Morning peak
Stavanger × Free period .075**
(.026)
.091
(.059)
Free period .053**
(.020)
-.011
(.045)
Number of observations 13,232 11,800

() standard errors
*P<0.05, **P<0.01.
#The regression is based on aggregated data (total number of boardings per day per municipality). We, therefore, weight by the number of boardings at the first day of observation in order address the accuracy of the data. We apply analytical weights in Stata.

In summary, our analysis indicates a general 7.5 % increase (significant), and a 9.1 percent increase during the am peak (not significantly different from zero), in daily boardings in Stavanger attributable to the initiative of free public transit. The inclusion of a control group has made it possible to control for the fact that public transport in the whole of Norway has steadily increased after the covid-19 pandemic and for seasonal effects. A future expansion of this study may be to include a synthetic control making the trends in the before period even more identical in the treatment and control groups.


Declarations of interest

The paper is funded by Norwegian Research council project number 309392 and Norwegian Research council project number 326814. The public transport provider in Rogaland Kolumbus has also sponsored part of the analysis with funding and given access to the data.


  1. Buses produce the vast majority of public transport trips in Rogaland and Stavanger, with about 34 million passengers in 2023 (https://www.kolumbus.no/aktuelt/arsrapport2023/utvikling-i-tall). This is followed by local train, with about 5 million trips in 2023 (https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10484).

  2. Regular adult fares for those who were not entitled to free public transport: One zone single ticket NOK 42 (EUR 3.57), 30-day tickets NOK 630 (EUR 53.55); two zones single ticket NOK 77 (EUR 6.55), 30-day tickets NOK 1030 (EUR 87.55); three or more zones single ticket NOK 112 (EUR 9.52), 30-day tickets NOK 1430 (EUR 121.55). Children, old age pensioners, students and military personnel pay half price.

  3. Statistics Norway Public; Norwegian public transport with bus table 06670, quarterly data, https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/06670/.

Submitted: November 25, 2024 AEST

Accepted: December 21, 2024 AEST

References

Angrist, J. D., and J. S. Pischke. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3–30. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1257/​jep.24.2.3.
Google Scholar
Cats, O., Y. O. Susilo, and T. Reimal. 2017. “The Prospects of Fare-Free Public Transport: Evidence from Tallinn.” Transportation 44:1083–1104. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11116-016-9695-5.
Google Scholar
Duxfield, I. 2022. “Luxembourg’s Experience with Free Public Transport.” Eltis, the Urban Mobility Observatory. 2022. https:/​/​www.eltis.org/​in-brief/​news/​luxembourgs-experience-free-public-transport.
Fearnley, N. 2013. “Free Fares Policies: Impact on Public Transport Mode Share and Other Transport Policy Goals.” International Journal of Transportation 1 (1): 75–90.
Google Scholar
Kębłowski, W. 2020. “Why (Not) Abolish Fares? Exploring the Global Geography of Fare-Free Public Transport.” Transportation 47:2807–35. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1007/​s11116-019-09986-6.
Google Scholar
Storchmann, K. 2003. “A Paradigm Shift?” Journal of Public Transportation 6 (4): 89–105. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.5038/​2375-0901.6.4.5.
Google Scholar
Volinski, J. 2012. “Implementation and Outcomes of Fare-Free Transit Systems.” TCRP Synthesis 101. Transit Cooperative Research Program. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.17226/​22753.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system