1. Questions
Most new cars are equipped with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) that can provide information, assist the driver, or overtake steering, breaking and acceleration, in certain situations. Many ADAS are standard equipment on most new passenger cars, such as adaptive cruise control (ACC) and lane keeping assistants (LKA) (A. K. Høye 2019, 2020).
Although increasing uptake of ADAS is expected to improve road safety, several types of ADAS adversely affect driver behavior (de Winter et al. 2014; Hungund, Pai, and Pradhan 2021; Banks et al. 2018; Mueller et al., 2022) For example, drivers often become inattentive, engage in secondary tasks, or get confused.
To understand and counteract such maladaptive behaviors, we need more knowledge on how drivers familiarize and adapt to ADAS.
On this background, we explore the following questions:
-
How do drivers learn about ADAS?
-
What are the implications for their understanding and use of ADAS?
2. Methods
We use data from six expert and eight driver interviews. Expert interviews were conducted in January-March 2023 with representatives of car rental/sharing companies, an insurance company, and an automobile organization. Topics covered in the interviews include how and if actors in the automobile industry reflect on issues related to advanced technologies in cars, if and how they collect data on accidents related to ADAS-use, knowledge of incidents, feedback from costumers/members related to use of ADAS technology, and what ADAS-related challenges costumers/members report.
Driver interviews were conducted with participants in a driving study on a closed track in August 2023. One of the tasks in the study was to drive an unfamiliar new car with ADAS. To investigate how drivers interact with ADAS in an unfamiliar new car, participants were told to imagine that they had rented the car and were going for a drive, while talking through how they prepare to safely drive the car. Participants were interviewed twice: after preparing to drive the car, and after the driving session.
Given the qualitative nature of our study, a diverse sample of eight participants was deemed sufficient to gain in-depth insights and varied perspectives. The inclusion of expert interviews further strengthened the empirical foundation of our research. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed with Thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2006).
Details on study design and interview guides are provided in supplementary files 1 and 2. Table 1 shows characteristics of participants in the driver interviews.
3. Findings
Drivers know little and learn about ADAS mainly by trial and error
Thematic analysis (Table 2) revealed that drivers usually receive no ADAS training from car dealers or from rental services. Drivers don’t seek information in user manuals or the internet. Instead, they learn to use the systems in their own car by trial and error, or don’t use them at all, and they have little knowledge about ADAS. Drivers also report that they don’t regard exploring the car’s technology as safety-critical. These results are consistent with previous research (A. Høye, Uhlving, and Egner 2023).
Moreover, complaints to both automobile companies from car owners and car rental/sharing companies reveal that drivers regularly misinterpret warnings or actions of ADAS as technical errors, or get confused and scared when they perceive the car as out of their control (Table 2).
When preparing to drive the unfamiliar car, participants used quite similar strategies. They adjusted basic settings like mirrors and seat position and checked how to deactivate the handbrake, but few thought of checking or familiarizing with ADAS before driving. Only one of eight actively investigated the ADAS (checked which ADAS the car was equipped with, which ADAS were active, how to turn ADAS on/off) and three others explored the car’s integrated screen (mostly to find the navigation system and connect their mobile phones).
Those who more actively explored the technology in the car, including ADAS, were mainly younger drivers. The older participant did not do anything to check or familiarize with ADAS in the unfamiliar car, despite several owning cars with similar ADAS-functionality. Such differences should be investigated in more detail and considered when developing strategies for improving drivers’ knowledge about ADAS.
Drivers use mainly ADAS’ default settings
The participants in our driving study generally kept all ADAS-default settings. Those who have ADAS in their own car, also use them mostly at default settings, which is consistent with other studies (A. Høye, Uhlving, and Egner 2023).
The most used systems among our study participants are ACC, LKA, and parking assist. Reasons for not using ADAS were partly that they were not deemed useful, and partly a lack of knowledge about how the systems work or how to change settings. The most common reason for deactivating ADAS in other studies, is that many drivers find warnings, especially frequent acoustic warnings from LDW, annoying (e.g. Gaspar and Brown 2020).
Drivers’ knowledge about ADAS is safety-critical and has large room for improvement
We observe that drivers often lack knowledge about ADAS, few explore ADAS features and settings in their own cars, and don’t think to check or familiarize with ADAS in an unfamiliar car. It is not uncommon that drivers misinterpret ordinary ADAS-responses as technical malfunctions.
The lack of drivers’ knowledge about ADAS revealed in our study is an obvious challenge. It is safety-critical because drivers are unaware of the systems’ capabilities and limits, which is associated with inappropriate expectations about ADAS performance, overtrust, misinterpretation of warnings, and inappropriate use (Banks et al. 2018; de Winter et al. 2014; A. Høye, Uhlving, and Egner 2023).