RESEARCH QUESTION AND HYPOTHESIS
There remains a sizeable gender gap in bicycling in US cities (Dill et al. 2014; Pucher et al. 2011; Singleton and Goddard 2016; Schoner, Lindsey, and Levinson 2014). According to the American Community Survey (ACS), women make up less than a third (28%) of commuters who regularly bicycle to work in the United States (U.S.Census Bureau 2017). The ACS data provide some indication of the gender gap in bicycling but detailed data on the frequency of bicycle trips is more difficult to obtain.
Bicycle share system data is a relatively new source that can offer insight into the frequency of trips made by men and women. Some have proposed that bicycle share programs may serve to narrow the gender gap by normalizing the image of bicycling as an everyday activity (Goodman, Green, and Woodcock 2014). Analyses of bicycle share system data can provide insight into whether the gender gap in bicycling is changing over time, at least as part of shared bicycle programs.
In this article we examine the gender split in bicycle share trips made between 2014 and 2018 for three of the largest public bicycle share programs in the United States: Bluebikes (Boston), Citi Bike (New York), and Divvy Bikes (Chicago). We hypothesized that men would make more bicycle share trips than women, but that the gap would decrease over time.
METHODS AND DATA
We used publicly available system data provided by Bluebikes (formerly named Hubway prior to May 2018), Citi Bike, and Divvy Bikes for trips made between January 2014 and December 2018 (Bluebikes 2019; Citi Bike 2019; Divvy Bikes 2019). We selected these bicycle share programs because they had been operating for at least five years and included demographic information in their system data. To download the data, we used the R package bikedata (Padgham and Ellison 2017).
The system data includes a gender variable that indicates whether the trip was made by a man, woman, or is unknown, and an age variable for the birth year of the user. Gender and age data are typically only available for trips made by monthly and annual members because this information is collected when members sign up. However, there were trips made by casual users (single trip, 24 hr, 3-day) that also had demographic information. We excluded all trips for which gender was unknown from the final dataset.
We tabulated the number and proportion of annual and monthly bicycle share trips made by men and women from 2014 to 2018 for the three bicycle share programs. For the sub-sample of trips that also had information about age we examined the gender split by age category (<25, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65+ years). With very large sample sizes (nearly 77 million trips) we focus on meaningful differences rather than statistical significance. Finally, to understand how the gender split in bicycle sharing compares to the gender split in bicycle commuting more generally, we retrieved gender-specific commute to work bicycle mode shares from the 2013–2017 ACS 5-year estimates for the areas that these bicycle share programs serve (U.S.Census Bureau 2017).
FINDINGS
A total of 89,057,337 bicycle share trips were made across the three bicycle share programs between 2014 and 2018. Of these, 13.6% were excluded because the gender of the user was unknown, leaving a total of 76,981,561 trips. Excluded trips were predominantly made by casual users (92%), where gender was less likely to be recorded. Trips retained in the analysis were predominantly made by annual and monthly members (98%). Citi Bike accounted for over three-quarters of the trips (58.9 million), followed by Divvy Bikes (12.7 million) and Bluebikes (5.4 million). Of the 76,981,561 trips that had gender data, 76,058,835 (98.8%) also had information about the user’s age.
Overall, women made about one quarter of all bicycle share trips from 2014–2018, which is consistent across the three programs. Table 1 shows the gender breakdown of trips, overall and by year. Contrary to our hypothesis, with the exception of some movement for Citi Bike’s program, there was remarkably little variation in the gender gap by program or year. The proportion of Citi Bike trips made by women increased steadily from 22.6% in 2014 to 25.5% in 2018 (+2.9%), a potentially meaningful change, whereas the proportion of trips made by women for the other two programs hovered steady around 25% over 2014 to 2018.
While there was little variation in the bicycle share gender gap overall, it did vary by season and age. The proportion of trips made by women was lower in winter months compared to summer months (Figure 1). Across programs and years, women made 21.6% of all trips in peak winter months (November–February) compared to 26.0% of trips in summer months (June–August). The seasonal variation in the gender split was most prominent for Divvy Bikes, where women made 19.2% of trips in winter months and 27.4% of trips in summer months. In terms of age, the gender gap was generally wider for older bicycle share users (Table 2). For example, women accounted for upwards of 27% of trips made by users under the age of 35 years, but less than 20% of trips for users 65 years and older. The widest gender gap was for users of Bluebikes 65 years and older, where women made just 10.2% of all trips from 2015 to 2018.
Table 3 shows the proportion of commuters who regularly bicycle to work by gender. Across the areas these bicycle share programs serve, women make up over a quarter (27.7–31.4%) of the commuters who report regularly bicycling to work while only accounting for a quarter of bicycle share trips. While some caution is needed when comparing bicycle share system data to the ACS data, given the former is about trips and the latter is people, our findings suggest that the gender gap in bicycle share use in these cities may be even wider than the gender gap in bicycle commuting overall.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Bluebikes, Citi Bike, and Divvy Bikes for making their system data publicly available.